"Prepare for and participate effectively in a range of conversations and collaborations with diverse partners, building on others' ideas and expressing their own clearly and persuasively" (p. 163).
This quote jumped out to me immediately, because it reminded me of the discussion we have in our classroom on a daily basis. One thing that the Morning Meeting Book helped me understand was the importance of building off each others' ideas, instead of just saying the same thing another person said. Therefore, during sharing time we do a lot of "questions and comments" from the audience. I've recently tried to cultivate a language frame with my kids of, "I agree with Jonah because..." or "I disagree with Kiley because..."--and in this way I'm asking them to express their ideas with reasoning and build off of what another student has said. I had no idea this was part of the CCSS! However, I'm glad we're already incorporating some of this into our daily routines.
"They can hear lulls in the conversation and jump in to say, "what we are mostly saying, so far, is. . ." (p. 164).
This quote made me laugh out loud. Partly because I thought, "no. no, there are no kids that can do that". But then I remembered some of my interactions with kids in these grades and I though--yeah sure they can. I also thought--I know plenty of adults without this ability! I often find this lack of understanding the rules of conversation to be awkward. How funny that something so "academic" can impact our social/emotional development.
"The emphasis on visual supports brings us to another point. The CCSS open up the definition of speaking and listening to include nonverbal forms of communication and viewing and interacting with multimedia" (p. 164).
One thing Hawkins et al hints at is the opportunity for oral presentation of all types of writing genre, not just argumentative. I have to say, I agree with them. I think if you are to be culturally relevant to a student, as well as allow creativity to flow, there should be an equal honor of all types of writing and oral presentation. Too often, I think the standards committees get carried away trying to turn students into passionate and argumentative citizens--but what good is an analytical thinker if they can never describe what matters most to them, if they can never present something to edify others? This idea made me think of what Hawkins et al said in an earlier chapter that all writing is composed of stories (although sometimes presented in an argumentative style)--therefore the narrative writing style is hugely important in argumentative writing.
While reading the piece on the Speaking and Listening standards emphasis on multimedia, I couldn't help but think about how in love I am with podcasts. I'm currently OBSESSED with Serial (if you don't know about it, stop what you're doing and listen to it immediately). When I listen to the narrative podcast, I can't help but analyze the way Sarah Koenig is presenting the story, or criticize the way she interviews those involved in the story. I can obviously spot her bias, and how her bias influences me! This kind of metacognition process didn't happen by accident, it was provoked in my by some pretty awesome teachers throughout my life. However, I'm so thankful I have this ability and I know if I taught older students I would introduce them to my favorite podcasts and ask for them to analyze and argue about the narrative process that is being woven into these stories. When I consider this kind of learning that I engage in on a daily basis, I'm reminded that although these standards seem lofty and often too high expectation for children--it's not impossible to cultivate this in our students and expect that they rise to the occasion.
I'm deeply moved by the words of Michael Fullan, "change or die". My dad had bypass surgery about a year and a half ago. Before, he was a pack-a-day smoker. After his surgery, I talked to him on the phone and the first thing he said to me was, "I'll never smoke another cigarette again". I wish I had been there in person to record him saying those words, because a year and a half later, my dad is STILL a pack-a-day smoker. Truly, if death is certain, yet a person still needs support to ACTUALLY change--then yes, we should expect the same for teachers and the education system. I've found that the interactions with my grad school cohort over a group messaging app has motivated and encouraged me more than many other things education related. Collaboration, understanding, encouragement, and connectedness to others with the same passion and beliefs about teaching is invaluable in the school climate we are in now.